James McCabe vs Tung-Lin Wu Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 22 Oct at 07:28 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. McCabe vs T. Wu

AUS
2
Win
Played
1
Win

TPE
2
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: McCabe 2 - 1 Wu
They have played 9 sets in total, with James McCabe winning 5 and Tung-Lin Wu winning 4. The last match between James McCabe and Tung-Lin Wu was at the Suzhou Challenger, 22-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with James McCabe getting the victory 2-6 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| McCabe | 2 |
| Wu | 1 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(R2) Suzhou Challenger(10-22-25)
(SF) Nonthaburi 4 Challenger(09-28-24)
(R1) Shenzhen 1 Challenger(04-24-24)
J. McCabe vs T. Wu H2H Profile
J. McCabe vs T. Wu Match Preview:
- James Mc Cabe wins 42.77% of points on his second serve, while Tung-Lin Wu achieves 46.87%. Could this give Tung-Lin Wu an edge in serving under pressure?
- During return games, James Mc Cabe has won 43.92% of second serve points, slightly behind Tung-Lin Wu's 45.92%. Will Tung-Lin Wu's superior return performance impact James' serve?
- On first serve returns, James secures 23.44% compared to Tung-Lin Wu's 27.26%, highlighting another area where Tung-Lin Wu may have an advantage.
- In terms of breakpoint saves, James Mc Cabe has managed 57.55%, slightly outperforming Tung-Lin Wu's 55.61%. Who might have a psychological advantage under pressure?
- Over the past year, James holds a 46.27% win rate in matches, whereas Tung-Lin Wu maintains 42.22%. While these are close, does James Mc Cabe have a slight overall edge?
- On hard surfaces, both players have a career win rate of 60%, showcasing no discernible advantage in surface preference.
- When it comes to level of competition, James Mc Cabe has had a 50.00% win rate at the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, edging out Tung-Lin Wu's 45.24%.
- Direct head-to-head is evenly matched, with each player winning one encounter.
- In deciding sets within the past year, James Mc Cabe has been victorious 59% of the time, whereas Tung-Lin Wu has won just 25%, which suggests James may have a better stamina or focus in crucial moments.
- Evaluating the quality of opponents faced, James Mc Cabe's opponents were ranked on average at 242.01, while Tung-Lin Wu's were ranked at 268.96, implying James can handle a slightly more competitive field.
Editorial Prediction (October 22, 2025, UTC):
In recent months, James Mc Cabe and Tung-Lin Wu have demonstrated closely aligned capabilities, creating a highly competitive matchup.
However, key performance indicators, such as Tung-Lin Wu's superior return game and better second serve stats, suggest a potential upper hand.
In high-pressure moments, though, James Mc Cabe's ability to save breakpoints and his superior performance in deciding sets could prove crucial.
Simultaneously, considering the closely matched win rates and the level of competition both players have faced, each deserves equal contemplation.
Ultimately, these factors culminate in forecasting a hard-fought match with Tung-Lin Wu having a slight favorite tag, given his current trends and head-to-head performance edge.
James McCabe vs Tung-Lin Wu Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. McCabe vs T. Wu H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 5 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 45 | Games Won | 37 |
| 21 | Aces (Total) | 11 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:36:53 | Average Match Time | 2:36:53 |
| 62% (157/252) | 1st Serve % | 69% (180/261) |
| 73% (114/157) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (122/180) |
| 55% (52/95) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (41/81) |
| 45% (10/22) | Break Pts Won % | 28% (5/18) |
| 38% (98/261) | Return Points Win % | 34% (86/252) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 67% (2/3) | Deciding Set Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. McCabe Recent Matches Played
T. Wu Recent Matches Played

J. McCabe vs T. Wu Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.85% (166/126) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.83% (267/229) |
| 54.71% (372/308) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.41% (617/517) |
| 51.67% (3374/3156) | Games Win/Loss | 52.27% (5669/5176) |
| 60.09% (137/91) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.35% (204/158) |
| 40.00% (12/18) | Clay Win/Loss | 51.56% (33/31) |
| 33.33% (2/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 43.94% (29/37) |
| 53.57% (15/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 25.00% (1/3) |
| 0.63 | Aces Per Game | 0.38 |
| 2006 | Aces Total | 2007 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 654 | Total Double Faults | 940 |
| 1:43:43 | Average Match Time | 1:35:7 |
| 370.3 | Average Opponent Rank | 485.57 |
| 60% (11880/19778) | 1st Serve % | 66% (20998/31846) |
| 72% (8605/11880) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (14456/20998) |
| 49% (3874/7898) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5551/10847) |
| 41% (707/1740) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1305/3104) |
| 37% (7353/19625) | Return Points Win % | 39% (12519/31941) |
| 41.67% (5/7) | Slam W/L | 23.08% (3/10) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Masters W/L | 50.00% (4/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 53.33% (8/7) |
| 31.58% (6/13) | Main Tour W/L | 57.14% (8/6) |
| 52.26% (81/74) | Challenger W/L | 51.68% (169/158) |
| 70.87% (73/30) | Futures W/L | 63.03% (75/44) |
| 57% (159/279) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (262/476) |
| 38% (3/8) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 20% (1/5) |
| 52% (66/127) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 44% (74/170) |
| 58% (53/92) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (69/153) |
| 87% (155/135) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (287/235) |
| 13% (155/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (287/48) |
| 23% (137/31) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (208/32) |